🔗 Share this article

For months, coercive messages persisted. At first, allegedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a retired army general, later from the police themselves. Ultimately, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was ordered to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is among those opposing a expensive initiative where Dharavi – one of India’s largest and most storied slums – is scheduled to be razed and modernized by a corporate giant.

"The culture of the slum is unparalleled in the globe," states the protester. "However the plan aims to dismantle our community and stop us speaking out."

Contrasting Realities

The dank gullies of Dharavi stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that dominate the area. Residences are assembled randomly and often lacking adequate facilities, small-scale operations emit toxic smoke and the atmosphere is permeated by the suffocating smell of exposed drainage.

To some, the promise of Dharavi transformed into a developed area of luxury high-rises, well-maintained green spaces, modern retail complexes and apartments with proper sanitation is an aspirational dream come true.

"We lack sufficient health services, paved pathways or drainage and we have no places for children to play," states a chai seller, fifty-six, who moved from his home state in 1982. "The single option is to clear the area and construct proper housing."

Resident Opposition

But others, including this protester, are resisting the project.

All recognize that this community, historically ignored as an illegal encroachment, is in stark need economic input and modernization. However they are concerned that this plan – without resident participation – could potentially convert a piece of prime Mumbai real estate into an elite enclave, evicting the marginalized, migrant communities who have lived there since the nineteenth century.

This involved these shunned, migrant workers who established the vacant wetlands into a frequently examined example of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose output is worth between $1m and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.

Relocation Worries

Out of about a million people living in the dense sprawling area, less than 50% will be able for new homes in the redevelopment, which is expected to take seven years to finish. Additional residents will be moved to barren areas and coastal regions on the distant periphery of the city, risking fragment a long-established neighborhood. Some will receive no housing at all.

Those allowed to stay in the neighborhood will be provided apartments in multi-story structures, a significant rupture from the natural, communal way of dwelling and laboring that has supported the community for so long.

Industries from clothing production to ceramic crafts and waste processing are expected to shrink in number and be relocated to a specific "industrial sector" far from people's residences.

Livelihood Crisis

In the case of this protester, a workshop owner and multi-generational of his family to reside in the slum, the plan presents an existential threat. His rickety, multi-level facility makes leather coats – tailored coats, luxury coats, fashionable garments – marketed in high-end shops in upscale neighborhoods and overseas.

Relatives lives in the spaces underneath and laborers and tailors – laborers from other states – also sleep on-site, permitting him to afford their labour. Away from the slum, housing costs are often significantly costlier for basic accommodation.

Threats and Warning

Within the official facilities nearby, an illustrated mock-up of the redevelopment plan shows an alternative outlook. Well-groomed residents mill about on cycles and eco-friendly transport, buying continental baguettes and croissants and socializing on a terrace adjacent to a coffee shop and dessert parlor. This depicts a complete departure from the inexpensive idli sambar first meal and budget beverage that maintains local residents.

"This isn't improvement for us," says the artisan. "It's an enormous land development that will price people out for us to survive."

There is also concern of the development company. Headed by an influential industrialist – a leading figure and a close ally of the government head – the business group has encountered allegations of crony capitalism and ethical concerns, which it denies.

Although local authorities calls it a joint project, the developer contributed $950m for its 80% stake. A case stating that the initiative was questionably assigned to the developer is being considered in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

After they started to actively protest the development, protesters and community members assert they have been faced ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – comprising phone calls, clear intimidation and suggestions that criticizing the initiative was tantamount to anti-national sentiment – by figures they claim work for the business conglomerate.

Part of the group alleged to have issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c